The Silent Profession: Under-Assertion of Professional Voice in Australian Pharmacy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55136/apsj512Keywords:
Professional Identity , Professional Voice, Scope of Practice, Clinical Autonomy , Workforce Sustainability, Leadership, Pharmacy Advocacy, Pharmacy Profession, Community Pharmacy, Clinical Leadership, Health Policy, Professional Recognition , Pharmacy Workforce, Interprofessional CollaborationAbstract
Over the past decade, Australian pharmacists have taken on increasingly complex clinical responsibilities and have become more integrated into patient care. Yet despite this growth, the profession's influence, recognition, and authority have not advanced at the same pace. This paper argues that one of the greatest barriers to the future progression of pharmacy comes from within the profession itself: an underdeveloped and underasserted professional voice. Three key issues are explored. First, pharmacists are being asked to deliver expanded clinical services without a corresponding increase in professional autonomy. Second, fragmented advocacy efforts can make it difficult for the profession to present a strong, unified message to policymakers and the wider healthcare system. Finally, a culture that has traditionally emphasised compliance may inadvertently limit leadership, confidence, and willingness to challenge existing boundaries. Together, these factors reduce the profession's capacity to shape health policy, strengthen its role within multidisciplinary healthcare teams, and maintain a sustainable workforce. As pharmacy continues to evolve, developing a stronger sense of professional identity, leadership, and collective advocacy will be critical. Ensuring that expanded responsibilities are matched by appropriate authority is essential if pharmacists are to reach their full potential and continue making meaningful contributions to Australia's changing healthcare landscape.
References
1. Pharmaceutical Society of Australia (2019). Pharmacists in 2023: Roles and Remuneration. PSA.
2. Kellar J, et al. (2021). How pharmacists perceive their professional identity: a scoping review and discursive analysis. International Journal of Pharmacy Practice, 29(4), 299-307. Doi 10.1093/ijpp/riab020
3. Advanced Pharmacy Australia, et al. (2025). Joint Pharmacy Organisations' Paper for Endorsed Pharmacist Prescribers. Joint Pharmacy Organisations.
4. Forsyth P, et al. (2026). Professional autonomy in pharmacists: Independence within interdependence. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 22(1), 178-183. Doi 10.1016/j.sapharm.2025.10.005
5. Hays C, et al. (2020). Pharmacists' "Full Scope of Practice": Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices of Rural and Remote Australian Pharmacists. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, 13, 1781-1789. Doi 10.2147/JMDH.S279243
6. Yong FR, et al. (2023). Australian community pharmacy service provision factors, stresses and strains: A qualitative study. Exploratory Research in Clinical and Social Pharmacy, 9, 100247. Doi 10.1016/j.rcsop.2023.100247
7. Buss VH, et al. (2018). The impact of clinical services provided by community pharmacies on the Australian healthcare system: a review of the literature. Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice, 11(1), 22. Doi 10.1186/s40545-018-0149-7
8. Noble C, et al. (2019). Pharmacy student professional identity formation: a scoping review. Integrated Pharmacy Research and Practice, 8, 15-34. Doi 10.2147/IPRP.S162799
9. Australian Government Department of Health and Aged Care (2024). Unleashing the Potential of our Health Workforce - Scope of Practice Review: Final Report. Australian Government.
10. Ergas H (2023). 60-day dispensing: an analysis of likely impacts and key policy issues. The Pharmacy Guild of Australia.
11. Jackson JK, et al. (2023). A Qualitative Evaluation of the Australian Community Pharmacy Agreement. Pharmacy, 11(6), 188. Doi 10.3390/pharmacy11060188
12. Jackson JK, et al. (2024). Relevance of the community pharmacy policy environment to pharmacists' performance, as reflected in stakeholders' perspectives on professionalism and standards. Exploratory Research in Clinical and Social Pharmacy, 16, 100499. Doi 10.1016/j.rcsop.2024.100499
13. Tee L, et al. (2018). The capabilities that count for early professional success in Pharmacy: A case study of graduates, employer and course teaching team perspectives. Journal of Teaching and Learning for Graduate Employability, 9(1), 23-40. Doi 10.21153/jtlge2018vol9no1art679
14. Chapman CB, et al. (2020). National survey of pharmacists, intern pharmacists and pharmacy students in Australia: the nature and extent of stress and well-being. International Journal of Pharmacy Practice, 28(4), 355-361. Doi 10.1111/ijpp.12604
15. Australian Government Department of Health and Aged Care (2024). Eighth Community Pharmacy Agreement. Australian Government.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Khaled Abdelsamie

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
